Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Testing

The human body is an intricate organism that relies on electrical and chemical systems to maintain homeostasis and enable sensory perception. These systems, while subtle, are highly sensitive to external influences, including electromagnetic fields (EMFs). Given the increasing prevalence of man-made EMFs in modern environments, the need for robust EMF testing is paramount.

The Body’s Electrical Sensitivity

Our nervous system uses electrical impulses to communicate signals throughout the body. Tools like electroencephalograms (EEGs) and electrocardiograms (ECGs) confirm the body's natural electrical activity, highlighting its susceptibility to interference. Despite scepticism in conventional medicine about the concept of a "vital force," it is widely accepted that organs operate at specific frequencies, underpinning the effectiveness of EMFs in medical therapies such as wound healing and depression treatment.

Natural EMFs and Human Evolution

Since the dawn of life, organisms have adapted to Earth's natural electromagnetic background, including the Schumann Resonance — a global electromagnetic phenomenon resulting from atmospheric electrical activity. These naturally occurring frequencies have historically shaped biological rhythms and health. However, disruptions like geomagnetic storms, which amplify natural EMFs significantly, have been correlated with adverse effects such as anxiety, fatigue, and sleep disturbances.

Man-Made EMFs in the Built Environment

Modern living spaces often isolate inhabitants from natural electromagnetic fields while exposing them to artificial sources, including:

  1. Radiofrequency (RF) energy from wireless devices.

  2. Extremely low-frequency (ELF) magnetic and electric fields from power lines and appliances.

  3. Dirty electricity and transient electromagnetic waves.

  4. Infrasound and ultrasonic waves from industrial and consumer devices.

Unlike natural EMFs, these artificial sources operate at intensities and frequencies unaligned with human biology. Emerging evidence links prolonged exposure to non-ionizing radiation with potential health risks such as cognitive impairments, fertility issues, and an increased cancer risk.

Gaps in Current Standards

Regulatory frameworks, such as those by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), predominantly focus on acute thermal effects of EMFs. Chronic low-level exposures, which are more reflective of daily life, remain insufficiently studied and regulated. This oversight leaves populations vulnerable, particularly sensitive groups like children, whose developing tissues absorb more radiation than adults.

The Case for EMF Testing

EMF testing provides critical insights into exposure levels in residential and occupational environments. It helps identify and mitigate sources of electromagnetic pollution, ensuring alignment with health guidelines. Furthermore, regular testing fosters awareness, prompting the adoption of safer technologies and practices to reduce EMF exposure.

In conclusion, as the prevalence of artificial EMFs grows, testing and regulation are essential to safeguard public health. Understanding and mitigating EMF risks is a necessary step in fostering environments that support human well-being and resilience.

A Wave Building Biology EMF Assessment includes the following:

  • A free 20 minute initial phone consultation to identify client needs

  • Client pays $200 to receive detailed questionnaire and for a follow-up video conference (approximately 40 minutes)

  • Client provided detailed questionnaire to complete (allow 1-2 hours to compete)

  • Video conference to discuss questionnaire and to determine best course of action (approximately 40 minutes). Face to face meeting in Woolgoolga optional

  • Client pays $680 for site inspection, research, detailed report with customised recommendations and follow-up videoconference

  • Building Biologist on-site assessment, using industry-leading EMF meters, takes around three hours

  • Report with customised recommendations sent to client within two weeks of site visit

  • Follow-up video conference with client to discuss results, recommendations and remediation (approximately 40 minutes).